Ken Miller on Intelligent Design

Back


Ken Miller's talk on Intelligent Design at Case Western University. Ken Miller basically rips Intelligent Design apart in a 2 hour long exposé of the claims of intelligent design and the tactics that creationists employ to get it shoehorned into the American school system.

Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: January 6, 2006 at 3:12 am
Author: theblur

Length: 01:57:10
Rating: 4.22
Views: 510721

Tags: religion politics intelligent design evolution biology

Video Comments:
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 5:02 pm)
The foremost evolutionists, Spencer, Huxley and Romanes, before their death, repudiated Darwinism. Haeckel alone supported the theory and that by forged evidence.
Dr. St. George Mivert, late professor of biology in the University College of Kensington, calls Darwinism a "puerile hypothesis."
Dr. James Orr, of Edinburg University, says: "The greatest scientists and theologians of Europe are now pronouncing Darwinism to be absolutely dead."
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 5:01 pm)
Sir William Dawson, an eminent geologist, of Canada, said: "The record of the rocks is decidedly against evolutionists, especially in the abrupt appearance of new forms under specific types, and without apparent predecessors.... Paleontology furnishes no evidence as to the actual transformation of one species into another. No such case is certainly known. Nothing is known about the origin of man except what is told in Scripture."
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 5:01 pm)
Dr. W. H. Thompson, former president of N. Y. Academy of Medicine, said: "The Darwinian theory is now rejected by the majority of biologists, as absurdly inadequate. It is absurd to rank man among the animals. His so called fellow animals, the primates--gorilla, orang and chimpanzee--can do nothing truly human."
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 5:01 pm)
Prof. Agassiz, one of the greatest scientists of any age, said: "The theory [of the transmutation of species] is a scientific mistake, untrue in its facts, unscientific in its method, and mischievous in its tendency.... There is not a fact known to science, tending to show that a single kind has ever been transmuted into any other."
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 5:00 pm)
Prof. Agassiz, one of the greatest scientists of any age, said: "The theory [of the transmutation of species] is a scientific mistake, untrue in its facts, unscientific in its method, and mischievous in its tendency.... There is not a fact known to science, tending to show that a single kind has ever been transmuted into any other."
Sorastor (January 9, 2009 at 4:59 pm)
EVERYONE. Mark HISTRUTHBEKNOWN's comments as spam. That's all they are.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 4:59 pm)
Prof. Fleishman, of Erlangen, who once accepted Darwinism, but after further investigation repudiated it, said: "The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it, in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but is purely the product of the imagination."
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 4:59 pm)
Prof. Virchow, of Berlin, a naturalist of world wide fame, said: "The attempt to find the transition from the animal to man has ended in total failure. The middle link has not been found and never will be. Evolution is all nonsense. It can not be proved by science that man descended from the ape or from any other animal."
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (January 9, 2009 at 4:59 pm)
Prof. Beale, of King's College, London, a distinguished physiologist, said: "There is no evidence that man has descended from, or is, or was, in any way specially related to, any other organism in nature, through evolution, or by any other process. In support of all naturalistic conjectures concerning man's origin, there is not, at this time, a shadow of scientific evidence."
Sorastor (January 9, 2009 at 4:58 pm)
Want me to point out some more verses, you liar and coward?